To evaluate a design from the perspective of an enterprise, we must consider the cost factor. For many start-up enterprises, the design cost of the robot is very expensive. Coupled with the subsequent opening and so on, the capital cost can be said to be heavy. Therefore, many start-up companies choose to design their own robots, but because of this, after many intelligent robots with many defects are designed, the overall appearance of the robot designers is inconsistent in the eyes of many robots.

For entrepreneurs, the entire Robot Design process has cost millions of dollars, so the loss is generally not large. When making robots, the designer is in the upstream of the industry chain and is very important. If the cost is not controlled in this link, the cost will be huge in the next production cost. The factors involved in the design of robot designers and entrepreneurs are not on the same line. Robot entrepreneurs put forward the cost factor, and designers put the design effect first.

Therefore, in the preliminary cooperation negotiation, they all have scruples. This is also why many robotic entrepreneurs choose to design the appearance of their robots themselves, and because of this, they often take many detours. Even if the end result is disastrous. All sources lack communication. Only by strengthening the communication links in the industrial chain can robot entrepreneurs avoid detours and win more opportunities.

In fact, all robotics companies want their robotic products to be cool and popular, but most startups can’t afford it when it comes to capital investment. So basically choose to do your own design. But from the designer’s point of view, designers tend to think that companies have their own considerations, they need to design a product, use traditional thinking to test and feedback, and then verify the market, and then make comprehensive improvements to the second-generation products .

For many startups, the first development is already in advance. As a result, there is basically a lack of communication between robotic exterior designers and robotic entrepreneurs, and they are not standing on each other’s feet. We should buy more groups of people for analysis, such as: early childhood robots, the people who use them, children aged 3-10, the people who buy are parents of 20-30 years old, one is the actual use of the masses, and the other is the buying crowd . Therefore, more will analyze the design from the mother’s point of view.

In addition to emphasizing the design of the robot, such as: head, screen, walking, etc., highlighting a point, and then designing around a point, many professional designers have adopted this way to design, the product will highlight the differences and make different products, In order to improve the competitiveness of products.

Some designers focus on using animal shapes to design robots. Many product designers say: “In early childhood robots, children tend to favor animals, so cute animal shapes should be designed to make the design more suitable for users.”

Then we saw that from the perspective of the robot design of entrepreneurs, some companies in the design of the product are often designed from the perspective of function. Therefore, in the appearance of the product, sacrifice is normal, but the final product The form will give the impression of being a little bit of a patchwork.

Of course, the final choice is the final consumer, but the design community is not high-level. In the development of any product, the first generation product is crucial and must reflect differentiation, from the idea of the product to the expression, I must have something that no one else has.

From Product Design to speech, when we have a unique vision, we need to find the gene in the product, if the first and second generation products find the gene, look for the gene in the subsequent fourth generation product. The product DNA will be integrated into the brand, then advertised in a unique way, and ultimately, the final product must be a sales culture.